BCITORGB wrote:
Tink says:
==============
I hate having a person laboring under the burden of a false
assumption.
I suspected that your assumptions were false, based on the apparent
fact, that you presented little support for making those assumptions.
============

Tink, isn't that what I said? I repeat: I clearly made a false
assumption about JC being kind, loving and forgiving. Thanks to you,
and your refeences to scripture, I have been disabused of such faulty
notions.

I was not disagreeing with you at all, in fact confirming your
observation of your apparently false assumption.

Tink says:
=============
You can see clearly now that your assumption was incorrect, and your
conclusions based on those assumptions are at best currently
unsupported, and at worst, totally false.
================

Too right, Tink!

I can see clearly now that your JC would never support such crazy,
left-wing, notions as help to the poor, medical aid to those unable
to
pay for it, humane treatment of criminals, respect for those with
differing sexual orientations, and a host of other leftie projects.

Now there you go again making assumptions and jumping to conclusions
with the blinders of choice on. If you choose to see only limited data
and/or distort the data you have chosen to use, it should not be a
surprise if you jump to the wrong conclusion!

You have knocked silly notions of a kind and caring prophet right out
of my head.

Good, the silly notions you had, were definitely silly, though I
suspect that there are a lot of other silly ones that remain. We will
have to work on them another time!

e
Tink says:
======================
You are probably in the position that until you can present
supportable
assumptions, that you can not make any correct and supportable
conclusions about the above discussion.
===================

Tink, I'm really not sure what you're trying to say here.

Can I make supportable conclusion? Well, sure. IF I can assume that
you
know what you're talking about when you quote scripture, then I have
supportable assumption. Don't I? (You do know what you're talking
about, right?) So, based on YOUR supportable assumptions, I draw my
conclusions about the nature of JC. Based on what you've said, I
conclude that he's not a very charitable or forgiving guy. Thus, not
a
guy I'd like to emulate. That's the conclusion you wanted me to
reach,
wasn't it?

frtzw906

The problem with your logic, is depending on me to know what I am
talking about. To provide a basis of support for your position,
support your own position, and then you will have something to show me,
that you may be able to make logical and supportable conclusions from.
Otherwise, I could be blowing smoke up your ass, and you would not know
the difference, nor able to come to any supportable conclusion
yourself.

Respectfully TnT