View Single Post
  #22   Report Post  
Tinkerntom
 
Posts: n/a
Default


John Fereira wrote:
bb wrote in
:

On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:09:08 GMT, John Fereira
wrote:

Sure, it's simple to delete posts that you're not going to read buy

why
should we?


You don't need to bother deleting them, just have the willpower

not
to read them.


When did I claim that I've been reading them? For about a week on a

typical
day I would open up my newsreader, select r.b.p. (one of about a

dozen
groups that I subscribe to) and will see that 50-100 new messages

have been
posted. From the subject lines I can see a handful of what appear to

be
paddling related articles so I pick them out and read them. I also

see a
bunch of threads that are clearly off topic, some with subject lines

that
are essentially calling one of the participants names. As is the

case with
most newsreaders, if I don't want to see the same articles the next

time I
read the group I have to mark the articles as read (even if I don't

read
them). So even though I'm not actually reading every article posted

to the
group I have to take action to indicate that I don't want to see

them.
Furthermore, when 80-90% of the articles posted are off topic, it

become
more difficult to find articles that *are* paddling related.

This is a newsgroup about paddling. There are many other
newsgroups in which political discussion, and even flaming is on

topic.
Those that want to read that kind of article can go to those

groups.

That all sounds just dandy, but it doesn't work in reality. I

tried
going from the boating news group to the political group to talk
politics, and a boating topic broke out. I left my football group

and
went the flame group to do some flaming and a football discussion
broke out. Even the dang political and flaming groups stray off
topic. Personally, I think it's all Bush's fault.


I don't expect that every newsgroup is going to remain 100% on topic,

but
when 80-90% of the group consist of off topic posts, to the point

where some
of the participants in those threads are essentially just calling

each other
names and creating new thread solely for that purpose it's getting a

bit out
of hand.


That's
the whole point of creating topically based groups.


Stop blaming others for your own lack of willpower. It fairly easy

to
skip posts that aren't relevant.


Again, I'm not reading the off topic posts. I still have to read the


subject line for the thread to know if they're off topic and then

mark them
as read. It's much easier to skip posts that are not relevant if

they're
posted in a group that I haven't subscribed to.

I've been reading this
group for about 7 years and this is the worse case of off-topic

article
posting I've ever seen. I've been participating on usenet for 20

years
and the number of off-topic article to on topic articles is just

about
the highest ratio I've seen as well.


Get used to it because it's not going to go away. Society changes,
even use net society.

Those that continue to post the off topic articles are just flat

out
rude.


Off topic is now the norm. You may consider it rude, but it is now
the norm.


At least in this newsgroup, off topic is not the norm, which is one

of the
reasons that I have continued to read it for 7 years.


I agree with you whole heartedly, calling people names is totally rude,
and they are wasting our time if we have to sort through all the crap,
to find a gold nugget that is worth holding on to. Flaming and
insulting is also rude, and I realize that there were certain ones on
another thread, that is all they seem to be interested in doing. Even
for those of us having a nice OT discussion it has been very
frustrating. I have even spent a lot of time attempting to settle their
meaningless dispute, which recently has settled down some. Sadly, I
suspect that they both have thoughts that would be profitable to share
in a civil fashion. It reminds me of some kids standing 5 feet apart,
yelling invectives at each other. For us watching, it is amusing in a
way at first, for awhile, but then it becomes annoying and rude.

It is also rude, and certainly poor usenet practice, to diagnose
certain people, in such a way as to put them down, not for what they
have to say, by addressing what they say, but by a personal assault on
their character or personality. This being a discussion group, address
the issue being discussed. If you don't like the discussion, or don't
agree with the way the discussion is going, you are free to ignore, but
noone is making you listen.

riverman, in his current post to you says some things have changed, and
I am sure he is right. That is the nature of life, and we all love to
talk about the good old days. I am approaching 60, and I have seen a
few gallons of water go under the bridge, and it is definitely
different than it was so long ago. My favorite camping spot was overrun
by 4x4 with little plastic boats on top, and that was 20 years ago,
back in the good old days. I hate to venture the thought of how it
would be today. I use to set at night around the campfire, and listen
to coyote sing there song. Last time I was at the old campsite, all I
could hear were some of those rowdy paddlers I think trying to sing,
while at the same time yelling and screaming, and throwing beer cans
and bottles at each other. Now that was really rude and annoying. The
next day they were all gone on to the next river to conquer, I suppose,
and I went over and picked up several bags full of cans and beer
bottles. It was very sad!

Use to be you could pitch your tent where ever, but now with the influx
of overnighter, who don't seem to think there are any civil rules that
apply to them, and crap where ever, you don't want to plan on pitching
your tent just where ever. And when you get your tent pitched, you sure
want to watch where you step. None of those solo moonlit walks among
the purple sage to smell the night air. If you are not careful, when
you get back to camp, you will smell like a crapper.

Now the only advantage of the RV crowd with their generators and
portable TVs is that when they bulldosed and laid a slab of concrete so
they could just "drive on, and be level", is that most of them are self
contained. Also representing maybe a little higher life form than those
rowdy river folk, they don't seem to throw so many beer cans and
bottles around either.

Alas though, I can not hear the coyote singing now over their
generator.

Now despite his protest in the accompaning post, riverman seems willing
to start OT subjects, call folks name, diagnose folks personality, and
make generally inflamatory comments about what they have to say. And He
invites his friends to make similar comments where upon he comliments
them for being cute in the use of the English language, or even better
in the "secret code and mysterious Laguage" of a couple little kids in
their treehouse. And I realize that being a fisherman at heart myself,
and he being a published fisherman, trolling is almost a natural
reflex, which I have seen him practice on a few ocassions.

Now I could have posted this directly to his post, and the exercise of
the usenet code would have been happier, however, I have been
instructed recently that it is debatable that posting on the usenet is
never trully directed. So what I say is not directed personally to the
riverman, but to all in general.

If I had bought that old campsite, then it would have been mine to run
the way I wanted it to be. However, being a poor old codger I never had
the foresight to save the money to buy it, or to even think that I
needed to buy it. I would suggest that if you want a good old moderated
website where everything is always the way it always was, and no bad
things happen, and no one talks about taboo subjects, that you set up
your own private little website where all you good old boys can meet
and talk about the good old days. I could even suggest that riverman be
the moderator, Oci-One knows computers and could do the design, and
Wilko already has a lot of very good articles to be contributed, along
with riverman. I am sure that there are many others that would be more
than willing to join, and you could write all the love letters to each
other, and arrange clandestine meetings down on the river to paddle or
fish. Which would be fine with me, and maybe others. You could even
make some t-shirts with your website address on, so all the wantabees
could envy you your t-shirt, and your private membership, which you of
course would not want to open to just anyone, since that would
eventually lead to the ruin of how it used to be!

Yeah things have changed, get use to it, some of you may have been in
that crowd of rowdys messing up my old campsite back in the good old
days. The biggest change may be I have my own 4x4, plastic boat, and RV
with self contained crapper. So, can anyone point me to the boatramp?
TnT