View Single Post
  #18   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 13:29:13 GMT, wrote:

On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 05:04:56 GMT, WaIIy wrote:

On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 01:12:55 GMT,
wrote:

On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 23:54:15 GMT, "Jack Goff" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Sorry, but I usually don't accept statements of explanation from US
military sources in the absence of independent verification. The
military lies a lot. We've had example after example of this in Iraq.

That's why we don't believe *anything* you post. You're more biased and
more of a liar than the military.

An edited "news" story from Harry. Of course...


At this point, Harry has a lot more veracity than the military. They have used
up all of their "OOps" passes.

BB


You're a fool to believe anything krouse posts.


That wouldn't change what I said at all!

BB


Don't you feel the same way about the liberal press, BB? Or anyone else who
posts 'half' the news?

There have been very few instances of documented military lying about incidents
in Iraq during this conflict. Your comment speaks more to scumbag Kerry's loss
than to reality.

But, with the closeness of your ties to Krause, I can understand the position
you have to take.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."