A Usenet persona calling itself Nisarel wrote:

Scott Weiser wrote:

A Usenet persona calling itself Nisarel wrote:

Scott Weiser wrote:

The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation.

That's not a decision you get to make. That's a decision that
society as a whole makes, through the representative democratic
process.

So if the USA 'society' decides that all firearms must be
registered, you'd go along with it?

I would object to it, because it's a very, very bad idea.

That's not a decision you get to make. That's a decision that society as a
whole makes,
through the representative democratic process.

Quite right, as I said below.


This is
because registration is ALWAYS the precursor to confiscations and
seizures by authorities, no matter how much they may promise it's
not going to happen. Australia, Canada and GB prove that, and
we've had several instances in the US as well, specifically New
Jersey and California.

Nope.

Wrong. Guns, specifically banned "assault weapons" were confiscated both in
California and in New Jersey.


You just spew one idiotic gunner myth after another.

Facts are inconvenient for you, aren't they?



...

What I might do when the government attempts to *confiscate* my
firearms is a different matter entirely.

You'd **** your pants.

No, that's something unarmed cowards like you do when faced with an armed
assailant.

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser