"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message


snip

I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making
a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to
the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar
regardless of how you make your claim.

All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland
were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right.

You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying

Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is
waiting for
treatment.
=================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to
your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were
waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment.
==========================
LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a Canadian
site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you can't seem to
keep things straight here, eh liarman?

It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article itself says
(since the doctor in the article mentions specifically that all the
patients are under care, I don't know why you perseverate on it) the
point is I was only responding your claim about that one article - I
wasn't talking about all of Canada or all Canadians. I never said no
one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment - which is what you
claimed I said.
================
Yes, you did.

I refuted your claim that the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2.5
years for treatment.
========================
No, you did not, liarman.

Yeah, I did.

You said:

"Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their 'convenience',
we're talking about the convenience of the medical systam. When that 'poor'
person arrives at a medical facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they
will not wait 2 1/2 years for treatment."

Then I said:

"No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in a
specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies."

Whether or not you choose to accept that refutation,
================
You have to make it first, liarman...

You said:

"Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their 'convenience',
we're talking about the convenience of the medical systam. When that 'poor'
person arrives at a medical facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they
will not wait 2 1/2 years for treatment."

Then I said:

"No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in a
specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies."


that in no way substantiates your false claim that I said no one in
Canada ever waits for treatment. You are a dishonest scumbag and you owe
me an apology.
==================
No, I don't. And, I'm not the one that claimed they would, liarman.
Where's yours?

Huh? You claimed I said no one in Canada waits for treatment. I did not say
that. Your claim is false. Your refusal to admit your claim is false makes
you dishonest, and your continued dishonesty makes you a scumbag and a
coward.