wrote in message
ups.com...
I think your memory is wrong. I think the problem was one of substance.
There
were 17 volumes of nothing. Who indicated there *was* something
worthwhile
there?

*********************************

There were 17 volumes of material that said, "We don't have any WMD in
Iraq."

Facts:

We are in Iraq.

We captured Saddam and many of the terrorist leaders.

The rapes, tortures and murders of Iraqi citizens have ended.

Iraq had a free election this past January.

We have yet to find WMD in any large quantity, but that does not mean they
never existed. Reports are now that Russia helped in the transport of them
to other countries.

We are making a positive impact in the Middle East.

So focus on one thing if you want. When it proves that WMD existed, what
will your complaint be? The Liberals are running out of "....but" excuses.

An interesting side note: Nancy Soderbergh, a former Clinton official,
admitted to John Stewart (he was interviewing her after the release of her
book) that the Democrats hope for a failure in the Middle East, and that the
signs of progress are disturbing to them. When asked about Iran and the
positive things being reported in the Middle East she said " There's always
hope that this might not work."

Her closing comments were "Well, I think, you know, as a Democrat, you don't
want anything nice to happen to the Republicans, and you don't want them to
have progress."

How revealing. How disturbing.