"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article ,
rick at
wrote on 3/3/05 4:30 PM:
snip
=====================
No, you replied that no one is waiting for treatment.
liarman.
You owe me an apology, but you are too weak and too big
of
a
coward to do
it.
+=================
No, I don't. But it seems you have forgotten about your,
eh
liarman. Proof that people are dying in waiting lines in
Canada
have been presented to you, yet you are still spewing
about
a lie
you have already taken back. Why is that, liarman? Don't
want
to discuss your continued willful ignorance?
What happened is you blathered on about the people in
Newfoundland waiting 2
1/2 years for treatment, and I responded that they are not
waiting for
treatment. And they aren't. So stop being a scumbag, stop
being a coward,
suck it up and apologize. Or are you just too weak?
========================
ROTFLMAO You really are this desperate now, aren't you,
liarman? I'm not the one that was blathering about it.
Yeah, you were.
=====================
No fool, I wasn't. It was one site out of several I posted.
And
it was the only time I brought it up.
Right. You were the one that brought it up.
==================
Yes, I did, once. You are the one that kept blaterhering about
it because you didn't want to continue the discussion as it
started, people dying. Why is that, liarman? Afraid of the
truth, as usual?
You were rambling on about how people were waiting 2 1/2
years
for treatment in the story about people in Newfoundland. They
aren't waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment, and I told you so.
Then you tried to say that I was stating that no one in
Canada
waits for anything, which is not what I said at all. You are
a
scumbag.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying, and
still
are, liarman. You did make that claim fool, because the post
you
were repliying to was all about waiting for health care in
Canada. You have now decided to tap dance by claiming it was
about only one site, and one example.
You said that I claimed no one in Canada ever waits for
treatment.
=====================
You did. Thatvwas the discussion fool, and you made that
statement. Too bad for you that you are too stupid to know what
you're saying most of the time, eh liarman?
I never
said that. I said that the people in your example were not
waiting 2 1/2
years for treatment, and they were not. As it states in the
very article you
cited, they were all receiving constant care.
You owe me an apology.
=======================
No fool, where's yours?