View Single Post
  #147   Report Post  
P.Fritz
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John H" wrote in message
...
On 3 Mar 2005 09:24:22 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:



Again, I see that you apparently don't understand "implication". It

is
a lawfully binding statement, so, that in turn means that those

three
are nothing short of liars.


An 'implication' is a lawfully binding statement? Where did that come
from? Do
you mean to tell me that my 'nose-picking' question is somehow 'lawfully
binding'? How? To what am I bound?

You're missing the point, and you're trying my patience.

Suppose I said, "Basskisser, have you stopped eating what you pick

out of your
nose?"

There would be an *implication* that you had been eating whatever you

picked out
of your nose. Now, you know that you've *never* even picked your

nose, and
therefore the implication is patently ridiculous. It can't be true or

false.
It's not a statement of fact. It's a question.


But, the implication was still there, John. That is the part you aren't
grasping. An implication IS an accusation, and fully admissible in a
court of law.


Again, where did you come up with this idea that a question such as I
asked IS
an accusation? It is fully admissible in a court of law as what? A
question? An
accusation? I think not.

As such, Fritz, JimH, and Smithers are low class liars.
You see, by implication, if one is asked if he has *stopped* something,
it is then IMPLIED that he is doing that, or how else could he STOP?


OR (now listen!) it is a question designed to pull someone's chain!


Or designed to make asslicker drink his own bitter medicine.

It's not hard, I know it's going over Fritz's head, he doesn't realize
that by implication, he is a low life liar, but honestly, I thought
you'd have enough intelligence to understand.


I don't really think my intelligence is the issue. Why are you 'implying'
that I
don't have the intelligence to understand?


Pretty comical from someone who believes schnapps is whiskey.

(And he wonders why he retains the title of "King of the NG idiots")



Should you ask me such a question, I would not accuse you of lying.

You simply
asked me a question. If you asked me the question, I could:

- do nothing

- respond with something like, "I've never eaten the stuff I pick out

of my
nose."



Ah, so you DO condone, tolerate, and even like the idea of people lying
about other people?


I condone and tolerate and sometimes laugh my ass off when people ask
ridiculous
questions and someone else goes off the deep end.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."