"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 5:46 PM:
"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..
snip...
===
So, coward, why are you being a scumbag and refusing to
name
those valid and
valuable purposes of assault weapons?
======================
Because, liarman, unlike you, I don't purport to be the
arbiter of what is useful, valuable, or necessary. That is
the perogative of eack person, liarman.
Why did you say weapons also have valid and valuable purposes
if you were not prepared to name them?
What a coward!
==================
Nope. Because, unlike you, I don't pretend to be the arbiter
of
what is and is not a valuable use for 'any' product.
You said that assault weapons have value. That's just an empty
assertion
unless you are prepared to state the value. Grow up.
===========================
You've claimed alot of things here in this group, and have yet to
back any of those assertion up with anything but your lies. Talk
about emptiness, that's the whole of your writings. Why now
must everyone else bend to your ignorance, liarman? Again, what
is of 'value' is different to different people. Why should I
presume to speak for everyine just because you feel you can,
liarman?