OT--Uh-oh. What if the anti-war liberals were wrong?
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Clams Canino" wrote in message
news:i3hIb.172656$8y1.519584@attbi_s52...
BOTH parties were totally convinced about Saddams links to WMD, and had
been
for years.
You mean...the Democrats were saying things like this:
It doesn't matter what they were saying. What matters is, when push came
to shove, Dubya DumFoch invaded on lies, misconceptions, bad staff work
and bad intelligence.
Too bad Gore, Hillary, and Kerry can't take advantage of that, eh?
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real
...."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that
Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weap ons
stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has
also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda
members
... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will
continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare,
and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
|