JimH wrote:
"Jim," wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Jim," wrote in message
...

JimH wrote:


"Jim," wrote in message
...


JimH wrote:


"Jim," wrote in message
...



JimH wrote:



"Jim," wrote in message
...




JimH wrote:





"Jim," wrote in message
.. .





JimH wrote:






"Jim," wrote in message
. ..






http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022705D.shtml




ROTFLMAO. Thanks for the good laugh Jimcomma.

BTW: What do you thing of all the *good* things
happening in
the Middle East? Do you think our overturning of
Saddam's evil
empire had anything to do with it? ;-)

So you approve of the lies?

And what I see happening in Iraq is the creation of
thousands of
potential suicide bombers who will willingly give their
lives for
Allah in order to kill the infidels -- just like the old
crusades
(I don't recall any of them being all that successful
either)


Just for you Jimcomma: http://tinyurl.com/27hth

Care to answer the question now.

Do you approve of the lies?


You never answered mine.

I can't think of any good things offhand --



Figured. And what news channel do you watch?

Did you like the little story I gave you?
http://tinyurl.com/27hth
You could have been the main character.

The questions are still out there -- are you afraid to answer,
or are
you waiting for directions from someone else?




I already answered your questions. You have not answered mine.

I saw some political BS. A simple Yes or no will suffice to my
questions.

Too bad Americans are so eager to
accept the 1496 casualties and then says, "**** happens in war"
and then
forgets about it.

Latest numbers from right-wing John McLaughlin Group.

Amputations, wounded or mentally injured America soldiers =
35,500
35,500 lives ruined on top of the1496 Bush got killed

Iraqis killed by Bush's insatiable lust for Iraq's oil =
107,500estimate



So you approve of the lies? Check one --- Yes NO

Or the numbers? Check one Yes NO

I'm ashamed to answer Yes NO


Answer my previous questions please. I have answered all of
yours. If
you see my answers as "political BS" please respond to those
replies and
provide credible proof to dispute them.

On a personal note: You are pretty difficult to have a discussion
with.
You answer questions with questions. You fail to recognize
credible
sources and data as the truth if it does not fit your agenda. You
often
fail to provide credible sources of your claims.

;-)
THis coming from one who was caught in his own lie just yesterday!
--

I probably provide more references than anyone in the group, in
fact I
have been criticized for doing so

as to your question, I watch a variety of channels -- NBC, CBS, ABC
CNN,
CNBC and yes even Faux on occasion. The story was no more than a
cheap
adolescent shot. I'll bet you giggled for 10 min or so after
finding it.

NOW do you think you can muster the balls to answer my questions?



Think what you want. I already told you how I connected to the link
and
that method of connection was confirmed by another member here. I
had no
reason to lie, neither did he....yet you continue to focus on whether
or not
I saw some sort of spam car ad.

And as I said I have already responded to your questions. You have
yet
responded to any of mine nor most of what others here have asked you.

You are starting to come across like Bassy. You are coming across as
an
extremist.

Perhaps you indeed one.

Hmm, for someone who loves to correct other people's writing mistakes,
what to hell does THAT mean?