View Single Post
  #1191   Report Post  
rick
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/1/05 11:32 PM:

Still claiming no one waits for treatment in Canada?

I never said that.

====================
Yes, you did liarman.
"...No one is waiting for treatment..."


Just because it is a sentence doesn't mean it is a complete
statement.

==================
Yes, it does fool. Your next sentence even emphsised what you
said in this one, liarman.



Example:

What do you mean rick is a bit of an idiot, that's not true.
He's got to be
the biggest idiot on the planet!

To paste only the first sentence and then claim that I don't
think rick is
an idiot would be just as dishonest as what you have been doing
with my
sentence about waiting.

Here is more of the context:

======

As many as 100 children in Newfoundland face 30-month waits
for
the
high-tech scans, said Geoffrey Higgins, clinical chief of
diagnostic imaging
at the Health Care Corporation of St. John's. While the wait
is
"less than
ideal," he said patients' conditions are being investigated
and
followed by
other medical means, and that anyone needing an emergency
scan
gets one.
======================

LOL Sure, 2 years into a wait he might really NEED emegency
treatment, eh? At that time he goes right to the top of the
list. Maybe too late, eh? At the least, he has suffered more
than was medically necessary, and at worst is now beyond
treatment, or too weak to survive the treatment.


You're telling me there aren't poor people in the US in
isolated or slum
areas where they have a hard time getting a scan at their
convenience? Get
real.
====================

Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their
'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the
medical
systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical facility
in
need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2 years
for treatment.


No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of
scan in a
specific geographic area and the waiting is for
non-emergencies.

============================
LOL You just made my point for me, liarman. Your first
statement is declarative. 'No one is waiting for treatment.'
The next sentence just emphasizes it. Her you are making sure
that treatment and scans are seperate things, and saying people
are witing for those. Unfortunately for you, I have preseneted
facts that tell that canadaians are in fact waiting for
treatment, and you have now had to try to tap dance your way out
of this lie.




=====

What I am saying (clearly) is that nobody is waiting 2 1/2
years to get
treatment. They get treatment the day they walk into the
hospital. What they
are waiting for, as the article says, is a specific type of
high-tech scan.

Note from the above: "While the wait is "less than ideal," he
said patients'
conditions are being investigated and followed by other medical
means, and
that anyone needing an emergency scan gets one.

Now, let's get back to what you have been saying:

rick: kman also claimed that no one in Canada waits for
treatment, yet
another lie

======================
No, you are lying, liarman.


I never made the statement that no one in Canada waits for
treatment.

===============
Yes, you did, and you've even kindly quoted yourself above,
liarman.



You owe me an apology.

=====================
No, fool, you owe the apology. I have proven that peple wwait
for treatment, AND that some die waiting for treatment. I don't
expect you're honest enough to admit your lies though, liarman.



But I bet you are too weak to do it.

=================
No need to. I haven't lied...


as I've told you a dozen times (but you are such a
scumbag that you keep on lying) there are wait times in every
health care
system, including Canada.

=======================
That's not waht you claimed earlier, until your lies were
exposed, liarman.


No, I didn't. You owe me an apology.

======================
Yes, you did, and you even provided the quote yourself...



In fact, you will recall that you yourself posted
an article about people waiting for a specific test in
Newfoundland.

========================
Which is where you denied that Candaians are waiting for
treatment. You lied then, liarman...


As you can see above, clearly I was explaining that those
people were not
waiting for treatment, they were waiting for a specific type of
high tech
test.

============================
No fool. You didn't say that the people in the story were not
waiting for treatment, you claimed that "NO" candaians are
waiting for treatment. When you lie was exposed, you had to
change your tune, eh liarman?




You owe me an apology.
================

Nope.