"Tinkerntom" wrote in message
oups.com...

BCITORGB wrote:
Tink says:
========================
E in the 99%
N 95%
T 95%
P 98%
====================


All I can say is WOW! to your results. In terms of interpretation,
however, let me add something to you conceptualization of "N" -
intuitive. This dimension pertains to your preferred ways of
collecting
data. "S" is for those who collect data and come to understandings
through direct observation and experimentation. N applies to those
who
gain understanding through the abstract -- models, theories,
mathematics. I liken it to the different ways in which one can do
physics: (1) there's the experimental physicist - S and (2) the
theoretical physicist - N. Both are, of course, valid ways to gain
comprehension.

Tink, I just get this impression that you're a "tinkerer" at heart -
"S". You strike me as the kind of guy I'd like to meet when I'm stuck
on a back road somewhere with no way to get my vehicle moving. There
I
am, all "N" of me, with complete conceptual and theoretical knowledge
of how the G-D car is supposed to work, but nary a clue about how to
"actually" make it work (that's why I always make sure to renew my
CAA
membership). I have a hunch you'd be the guy with the toolbox, jumper
cables, etc etc, plus a nice thermos of hot coffee, who'd get down
into
the dirt to help me out. Am I reading you right? So, in my books,
you've got to be an "S". Of course, I could be reading you all wrong.
Perhaps you'd just stop and join me in my conceptual, theoretical
daze
- "N".

frtzw906

No, you have alot right, I in fact have a truck full of tools, and
jumper cables, and tow ropes. I have been known to stop in the middle
of the central valley highway, now known as TREX, and pull astranded
mororist out of the traffic during rush hour. Having done so whn they
offer to pay me, I say know, but let me tell you about God's Love.

That's some scary ****, Tinkerntom.