On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 21:32:15 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message

I have no idea how the number was picked. I simply tagged onto someone
else's message. You have nothing better to do. Read backwards through the
discussion.

As far as Bush, he doesn't need to lob nukes to be dangerous. Let's turn
the
question around: You don't want religious fanatics determining political
policy in the Arab countries, right? What about here? Do you want them
wielding the same influence here?


Let's *don't* turn the question around! You, et al, are making all the
wild
allegations. Back them up!

You are telling us you just glommed onto a number with no idea where it
came
from? Did you ever consider that perhaps the whole allegation was the
result of
overimagination?

No. First of all, the number doesn't matter. Could be 5 million, 12 million,
or 65 million. Irrelevant. If *any* number of zealots determine public
policy, it's bad for this country, both internally and overseas.

If you're not comfortable with the number being debated ad nauseum here,
pick one so we can get past the issue.


You missed the two questions:

Do you now believe Bush is going to 'take actions' to speed up the arrival of
this 'rapture'?

Did you ever consider that perhaps the whole allegation was the result of
over-imagination?

Or, do you just glom onto anything that might reflect badly on the
administration.

John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."