On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 08:30:43 -0500, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:59:43 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Clinton had several opportunities to assassinate or arrest the *******
prior to 9/11, but was worried about the Constitutionality of such an act.
In fact, he's on record (audiotape) as saying that he didn't know under
what legal grounds he could hold him when the Sudanese offered to hand him
over.

Why don't we just overlook the 75 cruise missiles?

http://partners.nytimes.com/library/...attack-us.html


From your reference:

"Clinton and his national security team linked both sites to Osama bin Laden,
the exiled Saudi millionaire tied by U.S. intelligence to the twin bombings on
Aug. 7 in Kenya and Tanzania. The bombings killed 12 Americans and nearly 300
Africans.

Bin Laden, who is in Afghanistan, apparently survived the attack, which
officials insisted was not aimed at him."

Yet nothing more was done...

And, strangely enough, I don't recall a lot of liberal whining about doing
nothing more...