"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jim-- wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Backyard Renegade wrote:

Harry Krause wrote in message
...
Backyard Renegade wrote:

"Clams Canino" wrote in message
news:yT2Hb.468865$Dw6.1379682@attbi_s02...
Regardless of agenda or bias, the premise is basically true.
Husseins
capture is unlikely to seriously harm or impact Al Qaeda. The
connection -
if any - appears tangental at the most. The only way it can
impact
Al Qaeda
is to throw a scare into the corrupt states that look the
other
way
as
opposed to ****ing off thier more radical elements.

Iraq wasn't about Al Qaeda and was *never* billed as such. It
was
billed
(right or wrong) as about WMD.


Let me ask a question here. Is it at all possible that the
convoys
of
trucks tracked into Seria the last few weeks while the French,
Russians, and Germans held the majority of the member countries
back,
were the very carefully accounted for WMD moving to the Bekka
(sp?)
valley in Lebanon? Could we really know where they are


Uh, we have a president of the USA who couldn't point out
Afghanistan
on
a globe. You want an answer to a hypothetical?


Hummm, insults... I guess I should take that as a yes.


Insults? Bush is as dumb as a post. Why do you think he could point
out
Afghanistan on a globe of the world?

I assume you meant to say "could not".



No, I meant what I said.


Been drinking again Harry?



Why do you think Bush could point out Afghanistan on a map of the world?
I don't think he could do it.



Who gives a flying crap what you think?