"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..
"rick" wrote in message
.net...
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 2/27/05 4:52 PM:
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick
at
wrote on 2/27/05 6:32 AM:
snip...
If you are using cars as a justification for assault
weapons,
then you are
comparing the two, fool. LOL.
==========================
No fool. It is you that is trying to justify something
based on
what YOU determine to be a need. You failed.
You brought up cars, not me.
======================
No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the
determination whether or not people should have them. You
lost, again, and now have you resort to your ignorant spews...
You brought up cars. Check.
===============
LOL STill as dense and stupid as ever I see, eh liar? You
brought up 'need' as the basis for owning an object. I just
proved to you that 'need' has no bearing on what people do and do
not 'have' to own or 'want' to own. You're ignorance is very
amusing. Well worth the effort to expose it.