"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 2/27/05 5:19 PM:
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
,
Tinkerntom
at wrote on 2/27/05 2:39 PM:
snip...
Do you think rick is interested in any messages?
==============
Yes, truthful ones. When you going to make one?
There are no Canadians dying in waiting lines for health care.
If just one
of them did, it would be a national scandal featured as the
lead in every
news media.
=======================
LOL Keep telling yourself that. Maybe one day even you will
believe your ignorance.
He's not even interested in supporting any of his own
statements.
================
I have fool. You, on the other hand, have never been able to.
Why is that? Too busy lying?
I haven't lied.
==================
Yes,. you have.
You made a claim that you can't support and you are too big of
a coward to
admit it.
================
Nope. I supported my claims. You've yet to refute them.
snip..
Well Tinkerntom, it's very simple. Rick has made the claim,
and
he has
failed to support it.
=================
LOL I provided sites for you. You are the one afraid to find
out the facts... Thanks again for proving your willful
ignorance, and the fact that you have nothing to back up your
claims....
Even Tinkerntom, frightened as he seems to be of your lunacy,
has
acknowledged that you have failed to prove your claim.
======================
No, he did not. You have very bad comprehension, fool. But, why
the reliance on somebody else again, fool? Why is it yiou seem
to be too stupid, too ignorant, or to frightened to look up the
information that I provided?
Do you agree?
=================
Not if he reads the entire thread, and sees that I have
supported
my claims. More than once.
Add him to the list of people (everyone but you) who hasn't
seen any support
for your claim.
=================
Try again, fool...
And yet the
bottom line as I see it, is that it is your system, and if
it
works for
you, that is your business. It would only become my business
if someone
tried to enforce the system or some variation here in the
States, which
Hillary tried, and at the time, the majority of the people
decided that
we preferred the existing system we already have.
But do you agree that rick has made a claim that he has
failed
to support?
The topic at hand is really quite irrlevant to the question.
=================
LOL I provided sites for you. You are the one afraid to find
out the facts... Thanks again for proving your willful
ignorance, and the fact that you have nothing to back up your
claims....
Add him to the list of people (everyone but you) who hasn't
seen any support
for your claim.
================
Try again, fool.
Now as far as r being a liar and a coward, I don't know. I
came back
refreshed from vacation to find you two carrying on. I don't
know when
or where it started, and mostly have tried to ignore your
spat. I have
not seen any point in getting involved, or of even going
back
and
trying to find the supposed and questioned post by either
one
of you. I
have enough trouble keeping my post square as you well know
from our
previous experiences. I have been told back in the beginning
by my good
friends Wilko and riverman, not to say anything on the
forum,
that you
would say to someone face to face. Now seeing that he is a
gun
nut
(your definition) and possibly walks around with his
"Assault
weapon"
armed and ready, it might not be wise to walk up to him and
call him a
"liar and a coward." So then I find it most profitable to
refraim from
doing so here on the net as well.
But do you agree that rick has made a claim that he has
failed
to support?
=================
LOL I provided sites for you. You are the one afraid to find
out the facts... Thanks again for proving your willful
ignorance, and the fact that you have nothing to back up your
claims....
Add him to the list of people (everyone but you) who hasn't
seen any support
for your claim.
===========
Try again, fool...
C'mon Tinkerntom, what type of society are we to build here
in
rec.boats.paddle if we are not to support the basic
building
blocks
of
logical discussion? Shame on you!
Now if you wanted to continue a new thread about the
advantages of the
Canadian Health Care system, sometime in the future, maybe
there could
be a logical discussion, but I doubt that could happen at
this
time in
this thread. There appears to be to much macho image at risk
between
the two of you. I will look forward to that discussion, and
I
hope that
I am back on your list of reasonable non cowards! TnT
This is about basic integrity Tinkerntom. The topic is really
a
subordinate
issue. It is no different than if rick were to claim that
purple kayaks
result in increased death rates.
=================
LOL I provided sites for you. You are the one afraid to find
out the facts... Thanks again for proving your willful
ignorance, and the fact that you have nothing to back up your
claims....
Add him to the list of people (everyone but you) who hasn't
seen any support
for your claim.
================
Try again, fool.