"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...
"KMAN" wrote in message
.. .
"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article t, rick
at
wrote on 2/25/05 12:15 AM:
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article ,
rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 9:32 PM:
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
snippage...
IOW, you know you're beat and are trying to slither out of
admitting it. I'm
not going to do your homework for you. Besides, YOU are the
one who implied
substantial US deaths from "assault weapons," so it's up to
YOU to
substantiate that claim.
Unless there are no deaths from them, it doesn't matter. They
aren't needed
==============
According to whom????? You? You are hardly the arbiter of
what
people need. If I were you, the first thing I'd do is look
for
an education. Yours was sorely lacking. Maybe you should
demand
your money back...
Whatever selfish but harmless reasons there might be for
desiring to own an
assault weapon, they can't possibly outweight the benefits of
not having
them available to those who wish to kill a lot of people
quickly.
========================
Where are all these people that wish to kill 'a lot'(code for
1000s) of people?
"A lot" is NOT code for 1000s of people. It's not code for anything.
==============
Yes, it is. Especially when you keep saying it, despite the fact that
it isn't so.
How much is a lot of donuts? 1000?
Only a nut like you thinks "a lot" means 1000s!
=======================
LOL Nope, you're the one that keeps talking about a lot, and the 1000s
of people that are shot in the US.
1) I have talked about "a lot." This does not mean 1000s.
=====================
Youn are the one talking about 1000s...
I'm talking about a lot of things.
But not once have a talked about one person shooting 1000s of people.
2) I have also talked about the FACT that more than 30000 people die from
guns in the US each year.
================
There you go. See, I knew you'd remember sooner or later. Now, put you
fantasies together and make them all crack dealers shooting up parks...
You are pathetic.
Again, fortunatly you are not the arbiter of
what is or is not needed. You really have no clue about weapons,
do you, fool?
I know that an assault rifle is designed to kill a lot of people
quickly.
=====================
No, you don't. Try learning a little more. Many assault weapons
calibers are very intermediate cartridges, designed to wound rather
than kill.
Oh, great!
=====================
What, more ignorance on your part? You really don't know anything about
guns except what your brainwashing has taught you, do you?
Hm. Well, if brainwashing = fanaticism, you should hear yourself. You
really sound...well...crazy.
==================
from the head loony? hanks fool...
What are my loony beliefs?
There are many weapons that have far greater chance of killing than
assualt weapons. Can any weapon kill? Sure, even a slingshot, but they
don't kill just because they "look" mean. You really are a hoot. A
laugh a minute.
I'll amend:
I know that an assault rifle is designed to put a lot of bullets into a
lot of people quickly.
====================
So can many other weapons.
Good, get rid of those too.
===============
Fortunately yiou don't get to make that call.
Never said I do.
That's why you'll find the statistics of 'assault weapon' use in crime
pretty small.
Again, tell the the difference between the operation of an assault
weapon and others.
I know that an assault rifle and many other weapons are designed to put a
lot of bullets into a lot of people quickly.
==================
Well a new tune!! Before it was only assault weapons that could do this.
Tap, tap, tap...
Never said that either.
Only selfish idiots or people who want to kill a lot of other people
would be in favour of having such guns.
====================
Only fools would be in favor of curbing everyone elses rights...
Rights are curbed all the time. Otherwise there would be no laws at all.
It's a question of balance, and the need for some nut like you to have a
weapon designed to kill a lot of people quickly does not outweight the
public good...unless you are a nut. Which you are.