"KMAN" wrote in message
.. .
"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
t, rick
at
wrote on 2/25/05 12:15 AM:
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
,
rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 9:32 PM:
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
snippage...
IOW, you know you're beat and are trying to slither
out of
admitting it. I'm
not going to do your homework for you. Besides, YOU
are the
one who implied
substantial US deaths from "assault weapons," so it's
up to
YOU to
substantiate that claim.
Unless there are no deaths from them, it doesn't
matter. They
aren't needed
==============
According to whom????? You? You are hardly the
arbiter of
what
people need. If I were you, the first thing I'd do is
look
for
an education. Yours was sorely lacking. Maybe you
should
demand
your money back...
Whatever selfish but harmless reasons there might be for
desiring to own an
assault weapon, they can't possibly outweight the
benefits of
not having
them available to those who wish to kill a lot of people
quickly.
========================
Where are all these people that wish to kill 'a lot'(code
for
1000s) of people?
"A lot" is NOT code for 1000s of people. It's not code for
anything.
==============
Yes, it is. Especially when you keep saying it, despite the
fact that it isn't so.
How much is a lot of donuts? 1000?
Only a nut like you thinks "a lot" means 1000s!
=======================
LOL Nope, you're the one that keeps talking about a lot, and
the 1000s of people that are shot in the US.
1) I have talked about "a lot." This does not mean 1000s.
=====================
Youn are the one talking about 1000s...
2) I have also talked about the FACT that more than 30000
people die from guns in the US each year.
================
There you go. See, I knew you'd remember sooner or later. Now,
put you fantasies together and make them all crack dealers
shooting up parks...
Again, fortunatly you are not the arbiter of
what is or is not needed. You really have no clue about
weapons,
do you, fool?
I know that an assault rifle is designed to kill a lot of
people quickly.
=====================
No, you don't. Try learning a little more. Many assault
weapons calibers are very intermediate cartridges, designed
to wound rather than kill.
Oh, great!
=====================
What, more ignorance on your part? You really don't know
anything about guns except what your brainwashing has taught
you, do you?
Hm. Well, if brainwashing = fanaticism, you should hear
yourself. You really sound...well...crazy.
==================
from the head loony? hanks fool...
There are many weapons that have far greater chance of
killing than assualt weapons. Can any weapon kill? Sure,
even a slingshot, but they don't kill just because they
"look" mean. You really are a hoot. A laugh a minute.
I'll amend:
I know that an assault rifle is designed to put a lot of
bullets into a lot of people quickly.
====================
So can many other weapons.
Good, get rid of those too.
===============
Fortunately yiou don't get to make that call.
That's why you'll find the statistics of 'assault weapon' use
in crime pretty small.
Again, tell the the difference between the operation of an
assault weapon and others.
I know that an assault rifle and many other weapons are
designed to put a lot of bullets into a lot of people quickly.
==================
Well a new tune!! Before it was only assault weapons that could
do this. Tap, tap, tap...
Only selfish idiots or people who want to kill a lot of other
people would be in favour of having such guns.
====================
Only fools would be in favor of curbing everyone elses rights...