On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:50:49 -0500, thunder wrote:

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:26:09 -0500, John H wrote:


There is no 'difficulty' to divide, Jimcomma. No one, except you, gives a
rat's ass about Gannon. The important question to answer is:

You are right, no one should care about Gannon, but you are also wrong.
The important question is: How did someone with inadequate credentials
gain access to the President? The President's security *should* be more
important than any damn question Gannon asked.

I expect there were enough Secret Service folks around to handle any supposed
'security' issues that may have arisen. I find it hard to believe that you
liberals are so suddenly concerned with the 'security' of the president!

No, the important question remains that which you folks and the major media
delete:

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the
U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup
lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being
on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security
is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've
said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work
with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

What a great question!!


John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes