in article t, rick at
wrote on 2/25/05 12:13 AM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 10:44 PM:

snip

No look at what you said:

"You're the one that claimed that the drug dealers were
buying
assault weapons at the corner gun-mart, and that they
killed
1000s of people every year"
==============
Yes, I repeated the gist of your previous spew... A spew
that
is
so full of ignorance and idiocy that it only gets the
derision
it
deserves.

Your "gist" include a specific claim that I did not make.
Thus,
your "gist"
was an attempt to deceive that was exposed.
=====================
No, it was not.

Whatever it was, it wasn't truthful. Because, the truth is, I
never said
what you claimed I said.
========================
Your intent was the same...

My intent was exactly what I stated, not something you made up.






I remain confident that the Framers did not have in mind
that
a
crack dealer could buy an assault weapon at the store on
the
corner and spray the park with semi-automatic gunfire.
=======================
No, they didn't have that in mind, and only you belive it or
are
trying to say that that occurs. Crack dealers have no
rights
to
buy arms.

Crack dealers who have not lost their rights to buy arms can
buy them. You
do realize that not every crack dealer ends up being
convicted,
right? Heck,
all they have to do is go down to the corner and buy the
right
weapon to
shoot any witnesses against them!
=====================
LOL Do you make this up as you go, or has your fantasies been
the main part of your life for years now?

What's to stop an accused crack dealer from buying an assault
rifle at the
shop on the corner and shooting a witness?
========================
Tellwhen it has happened. Setting up mythical what-ifs isn't a
discussion of rights.

Sure.

http://www.freep.com/news/locway/shoot4_20040604.htm

Now where's your link that proves Canadians are dying in wait lines for
health care?

What I did not say was that such incidents aco****ed for
1000s
of deaths each year, and thus, you are wrong to attribute
that
position.
==================
Yet you keep implying it. How many crack dealers are there,
how
many parks? Adds up to 1000s of people killed in your
fantasy
world of make-believe.

I never said any such thing, nor implied it. If even one
person
is killed
with an assault weapon - a gun that is designed to kill many
people quickly
- that's obviously too many.
=====================
Yes, that is exactly what you keep implying when you talk
about
spraying in parks.

I'm not implying anything. I'm saying it: if more than one
person is killed
with an assault weapon that is one too many.
=======================
Why? Why only these so-called assault weapons? Again, what
makes then so much more dangerous than other weapons?

Uhm. The fact that you can fire a lot of bullets in a short period of time?
Duh.

Oh, and I see that you are in fact capable of re-posting
information.

We are all still waiting for your repost of the evidence
that
Canadians are dying in waiting lines.
=================
I have, and I've told you where else to check several times.
that you wish to remain willfully ignorant is your decision.

What was the date and time of your most recent posting of
this
information?

It does not seem to be available on usenet.
=================
I have, and I've told you where else to check several times.
that you wish to remain willfully ignorant is your decision.



Anyone else see it?

It doesn't seem to be available. Why won't you share the date
and time of
yoru most recent post with this information?
======================
What is apparent is your complete ignorance in the use of your
computer. Why are you afraid of the facts?

Please share them.

As you are aware, thus far you are the only person that can see them.