Dr. Jonathan Shmithers asked:

How was the picture any different than you calling others "grammar
school
pig-pillers?


*********************

How can you be so obtuse?

The comment about grammar school pig-pilers was an opinion expressed
about a deliberate behavior exhibited in this forum.

To gratify a sick, twisted, predatory sense of "humor", one of your
crew posted a photo (so full of stereoypes it almost had to be staged)
and claimed "This is the recent wedding photo for so and so." In fact,
the predatory personality felt the idea was so inspired it deserved an
entire thread of its own.

An easily predicted group of folks jumped on the sick, twisted,
predatory bandwagon with celebratory high fives and gratuitous reach
arounds.

What portion of the previous two paragraphs would you care to factually
refute?

Now let's address the photo, as you're asking how posting the photo
compares to expressing an opinion that doing so was juvenile. Unlike
the activites upon which I based my opinion, all of which were easily
observable in the NG, the photo was not based in fact or reality. It
was, as I have said, the internet equivalent of a grade school drawing
with distorted features and some poor *******'s name penciled in below.

The hillbillie picture thread didn't say a thing about the guy it was
purported to represent, but it spoke volumes about the guy who launched
the thread and the easily led group of hypocritical psychophant
pile-ons unable to distinguish between adult or juvenile behaviors.