Weiser says:
==============
I suspect that it has nothing to do
with economics or subsidies, but rather you are using those arguments
as
stalking horses for your real agenda, which is "environmental costs." I
translate that, in the context of RBP, to mean that you want the water
to
remain in the river and not be diverted for agricultural (or any other)
use
so that YOU can use it for recreation.
===============

Did you read where I've said that? I have no real "agenda". As I said,
I pulled agri-business out of a hat -- any firm that is the recipient
of subsidies would have done just as well.

frtzw906