Weiser, again on the genesis of this thread:
===============
Ah, now it's turned from economics to "environmental costs." Please try
to
pick one thesis and stick to it.
=================
If you read carefully, it is still about subsidies. Clearly, if
environmental costs are not accounted for, we have a subsidy to the
firm -- the "people's" water being given, very cheaply, to firms.
I'm on topic, but I'm not sure about you.
frtzw906
|