"Tinkerntom" wrote in message
oups.com...
wrote:
Weiser says:
================
Not, of course, that the WMD issue was of primary
importance in the first place.
================
OK, what was the important thing then? What was that "1441" thing?
After the fact, you Bushies keep saying "it wasn't the WMD! it wasn't
the WMD! it wasn't the WMD!" But before the war, all we heard was: "
it's about the WMD! it's about the WMD! it's about the WMD!"
make up your minds.
frtzw906
You acknowledge "before the war, all we heard was: "
it's about the WMD! it's about the WMD! it's about the WMD!"
Is it possible that you were listening to certain medias that were just
quoting each other over and over and not really researching beyond the
news wire feed, and ending up with the same story. Not the whole story,
just the part they wanted you to hear, and which was the part you now
acknowledge you heard.
When the decision was made to invade, the media had no reason to overstate
the WMD argument, because they had no idea that Bush was lying and no idea
that no WMD would be found and in fact I can't remember even one media
feature that questioned whether or not Iraq in fact has WMD. But if you care
to read the address to the UN prior to the invasion, it's quite clearly
stated that it's about WMD.