"Jim," wrote in message
news
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:01:22 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

~~ very interesting tech note snipped ~~


Visit real audio stores, listen to a dozen decent-to-excellent speakers,
and unless the listening room is phuqued up, you'll usually find you're
OK with the bass reproduction. It's the higher frequencies that'll have
you switching demo disks a million times, trying to decide whether you
like the one that reproduces female voice the best, or the one that best
handles flutes, high piano notes, guitar, mandolin.


Actually, you'd hit on a rather hot button issue for me.

I'm not big on faithfully reproducing bass level sound. Bass level
sound is just percussion really even if produced on a string. All the
subtle and nuance is in music is not produced at low frequencies but
rather at the mid to low high frequencies.

You and I agree that it is much easier to faithfully reproduce low
frequency sound - I just don't like it.

Later,

Tom

Suggest you catch this months Playboy Adviser. Supposedly the Clitoris of
a 150 pound female will respond to 33 cycles -- as the weight goes up, so
does the frequency.

Hmmm. That explains why I'm so tired after spending last night with a 130 lb
female. Fortunately, I'm able to roll my "R"s.