"BCITORGB" wrote in message
oups.com...
rick says:
==============
I see, anyone with information that desputes your ideology is
bogus. Thanks for the idiot-light warning.
======================
I don't think that's what I said. I said.... watch for it.....
carefully now..... :"Before citing them, you'd best find out
who funds
them. Once you've figured that out, you'll know which butts
they're
kissing."
In my opinion, knowing from whence an organization's fundng
comes, is
critical to establishing what sorts of biases they have. I have
no
problem with information that disputes my "ideology" so long as
it is
credible. The Fraser Institute is not such an organization.
==================
LOL According to your ideology. Thanks for the laugh of the
day.
The Fraser
Institute does the bidding of its patrons.
===========================
So, like I said. That means you claim that the information on
the wait times for treatment across Canada are bogus.
I've yet to see you refute their information. Like all ideologs
you just abuse their name hoping that that will be enough to
cloud the information. Nice try, but as usual, the problems a
of wait times are claimed by more that just the Fraser Institue.
I used them because they have the information by type of service
catorized and charted. You can access CBC sites, union sites,
and others and get the information, but it is not as readily
charted for reading. You and kman can continue to pretend that
by abusing the messenger that the data is false, but you and I
really know that the problems exist.
frtzw906
|