Rick wrote:
...stuff deleted

Your "uniformatiarian scientist" does not exist. You may have some
religious zealot making up words for scientists, but there isn't
any
branch, individual, nor philosophy that fits this description.

...stuff deleted

Sorry Rick, you stepped in it this time, and it really stinks.
Googled
Uniformatarian, and came up with pages. Just a few,

http://tinyurl.com/68rnd
http://tinyurl.com/4967j
http://tinyurl.com/4k4a7
http://tinyurl.com/5bood
http://tinyurl.com/4sb3v
http://tinyurl.com/6omh8
http://tinyurl.com/67bqr
http://tinyurl.com/5k9rg
http://tinyurl.com/4ypon


No, you did. The links you presented are mostly from religious sites,

which I will discard just as you do science. The other two are
references to previous beliefs, long refuled, which use the word. Any

scientist who believed that saturn and earth were formed by the same
processes would be laughed out of town. I have never met a scientist,

nor professor, who denied the global effects of volcanism or other
catastrophes. The recent tsunami, as were others in history, were
recorded in the geologic record. I never said the word didn't exist,
I
said that the uniformitarian scientist doesn't. I stand by that
statement and nothing in the presented URL's supports you.

Rick

Here I thought you were an open minded liberal conservative scientist
that was interested in knowledge where ever he could find it. Shame on
me for assuming again. Narrowminded anti-religious scientist are well -
narrowminded. Not much difference that narrowminded fundementalist that
have their mind made up, no more data needed! A mind is a terrible
thing to waste, and waste, and waste! TnT