View Single Post
  #185   Report Post  
Michael Daly
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 12-Feb-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

If you twits would quit letting terrorists in, we might not have to.


None of the Sept 11 terrorists came from Canada. The claim that
Canada lets in terrorists is absurd.

We may not have utterly unguarded borders with Canada or
Mexico, but not only CAN you travel freely from state to state in the US,
you have an absolute constitutional right to do so, regardless of what any
particular state may say.


You don't seem to know the difference between countries and states. Bizarre.

Which is fine, except that socialized medicine has been proven to be a death
sentence for the seriously ill because underpaid, overworked doctors have no
reason to extend themselves and because health care is free, people with
minor complaints feel free to clog the system with petty complaints.


Total bull****, seen from my position as a person living in a country with
government provided health care.

fund public transit.


So do we.


What Americans call public transit is a joke in the rest of the world.

When you give subsidies to companies to help them succeed, excel and become
larger, the immediate return is more jobs that the poor can take, thus
becoming productive and self-sufficient members of society rather than
leeches.


But the inevitable outcome is actually a transfer of wealth from the poor
to the rich.

Corporate subsidies prop up ineffective and obsolete companies. US steel
companies are a perfect example. They saw the competition as the offshore
companies and got government support. Instead of modernizing and competing,
the share holders got rich from the subsidies and the companies wallowed in
inefficiency. Now it turns out that those American steel companies that
were not subsidized are the real threat to the subsidized ones. BUt the
old companies still can't compete because they are more obsolete than
ever. Full analysis in The Economist (www.economist.com) 'coupla years ago.


Mike