JimH wrote:

Hmm, let me get this straight. You think that because there AREN'T
any,
that someone chose to not push the issue, perhaps because there WAS
truth in it, that that automatically means that they couldn't have
been
sued? Are you really saying that Jim?


I don't know because only God knows what you just said.

Nah, anybody not narrow minded, and with just a tad of intelligence
would understand. Just not you.