View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
K. Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:
Hurtwit wrote:


I was referring to a previous boat review of his

***************

But unable to point out even a single inaccuracy, and unable to
formulate a contrary opinion,
you reduced your comment to your specialty, personal attack. Thinking
of buying a boat again, one of these days, Hurtwit, or are you going to
be one of the bitter old non-boating reactionaries with no purpose here
and nothing to contribute exept negativity and bile?


Woohoo the political OT king & spam man Gould still tries to bend the
truth?? sorry Chuckles you claimed a boat has a hand laid hull when it
plain just didn't!!! you also went along with a 20ft wl boat being
billed as a 26ftr, which is a stretch in more ways than one:-) But why
the deceptions?? are you just an inexperienced simpleton, not unusual in
used car salesmen nor used boat spruikers; or bent?? that's the only 2
options you really have at this stage.

So post your evidence that the boat does indeed have a "hand laid hull"
& I'll post my rejoinder pasted from the makers own web site, then I
guess the question will be answered, just as it was with another of your
little "fudges" the 28ft full cabin boat doing 18 knts on "about" 6 gals
per hour, or were they Gould gallons????? the same Gould gallons that
have helped you fudge every time???? You just parrot marketing BS,
nothing less!!!

Just about all your so called "articles" are just deceptive marketing spam.

K

So the Krause lie of the day??? Here ya go:-)

So just getting back to the Hatt 43 lie:-) What happened was at
least 2 of the NG people lived near where he "claimed" he did & said
they'd settle if he owned a Hatt 43 or not by simply calling around &
taking a look:-) After all his usual abuse & fained "privacy" concerns
it was starting to look like his lying hide was about to be hung out to
dry:-)

This would be more than his ego could even contemplate, so in his
desperation not to be caught red handed (again:-)) he then lied again;
which despite it being totally unbelievable it allowed his damaged mind
to think he was still the big man his lies had created:-)

Doubt save to organise employment wrecking union strokes he's never
even been to Florida but he desperately needed to get away from the lie
mansion & the lie Hatt 43:-)





We had the Hatteras for two years. Last year, out of the cold clear,

a broker approached me with an offer to buy. Our continued Florida
lifestyle was somewhat up in the air, because the two breadwinners
hereabouts were about to be offered long-term but temporary assignments
they could not refuse in the Washington, D.C., area. So, after being
romanced a little, we sold the Hatt for almost precisely what we paid

for it. Not bad, after two full years of use. And I mean full years. So,
we didn't "make" any money off the Hatt, but we didn't lose any, either.
The proceeds were prudently invested.