BoatBanter.com - View Single Post - 260 Defiance, not that dissimilar to a Parker

wrote:
Hey Smith.......

Hey Gould..........???

Your post was #35 in this thread.

You can count??? don't sell yourself short chuckles there's hope for
you yet;-)

The first 34 were either discussing the merits of the boat, or similar
boats, and were civilized boating related exchanges. That's almost a
recent record for our sorry NG. Even Harry stayed on topic. You then
wade in and want to make a personal issue out of things.

Yep sad isn't it??? Not one person even looked at the merits, I can see
how you magazine dreamers get away with it, nobody but nobody can be
bothered or has the wherewithal to see past your obvious marketing BS.

Ever see one of these boats?

Na; but an ugly "little" tacker isn't it???

Know a damn thing about their
construction except what you're guesstimating?

Well don't be fooled by "my" timid nature Chucky, I did check & yes the
builders very quietly admit it's indeed a vacuum infusion built hull as
you well know!!! & seeing you tried & continue to try to hide the fact
I'm guessing you also know it's a sus method at this stage??? if not
then have a go at standing up for it I'll read that with interest.

Why did you feel
compelled to try and take a boating related thread into the crapper?

I didn't I merely took your spam & reviewed it on the technical merits,
that's exactly what a boating NG is supposed to do!!! or have you been
running OT political threads & pure spam so long you've forgotten???

Face it, the only discussions you are comfortable participating in are
those where you are attacking somebody. That's the extent of your
actual expertise.

Well thanks Chuckles I am good at it I confess:-) but also I give full
reasons why I say what I say & yes you & the brain dead dealers call me
names, sad really if I'm so wrong why don't you try to argue the issue,
i.e.this is NOT a hand laid hull it's vacuum infusion; a controversial
method used to mostly save labour costs by the builder at the expense of
a potentially crook hull. I've made all the technical points even
explained how it's done for those who don't know so have a go at me on
the merits please.

While you're at it apologise for the deceptive marketing will ya.

There are a number of specific benefits to the infusion method,
properly done. There are some weaknesses in roller lamination when
improperly done. I'd go through them with you but what would be the
point? You don't give a schlitz about vacuum infusion vs. roller
lamination. You merely seek a vehicle to make negative personal
remarks.

So is that an admission that this hull is NOT hand laid???? is it an
admission that the vacuum infusion method is "problematic" just as I
suggested??? Is that an admission you knew all along this boat was not
hand laid but vacuum infusion & deliberately didn't tell???

You're so insecure in your "knowledge" that you cannot compare or
contrast your opinions with those of others without also disparaging
the motives of the people holding opinions diverse from your own.

How can I compare?? you come along as the in the know boat tester &
claim it's a hand laid hull, it's bona fide 26ftr & various other bits
of BS. Before I can compare the merits we need to sort out exactly what
we have, so far you've admitted it's not hand laid but vacuum infusion,
then tried again to run away by saying I might be rude to you??? well
you can count on it, manners is not starting OT threads & not spamming a
no spam NG.

When was the last time you started a boating related thread, or made a
"positive" remark about anybody or any thing?

I rarely start a thread & have never been a thread starter, I oft
answer questions, so long as it's not you, the liar or a dealer I seem
to get on OK, even with those that don't particularly like me, at least
they begrudgingly accept I have a good go at being helpful.

("I'm positive Gould is a
socialist spammer, Krause is a lying windbag," etc, doesn't count). You
lay about in the shadows, saying nothing until its time once again to
feed your appetite for insult and mayhem. You then descend on your
sticky little web, with all eight legs flaily wildly, and begin
injecting poison into all you survey.

Well glad I'm not being abusive:-) Gould you posted spam nothing less
you also tried to significantly mislead the NG as to the size &
construction of this boat.

This isn't about my views on various construction methods it's about
yet another example of you being caught posting misleading marketing
spam, not unlike BS Bill does & always has.

Why not make a positive contribution for a change? Do you lack the
ability, or merely the desire?

I did!!!! I pointed out that this boat is more like a 23 ftr it's not
hand laid it uses a controversial new method (in this type of boat)
called vacuum infusion & I also even explained in detail how it's
done!!! You want more??? well hooly dooly what else can I tell ya, apart
from you're "articles" are regularly shown to be nothing more than a
rehashing of the marketers spruik.

Hmmm I'm tired but now need to sort out Krause's lie of the day,
thinking I'll have to start yours also:-)

K

This lying idiot has manufactured a story about his father being the
biggest OMC dealer on the US NE coast, needless to say Krause then says
that's where he learned all he obviously doesn't know about boats:-)

Here's just one of the lies from the "father" series, try to remember
he's talking $3000000 in the 70s!! Honestly it's embarrassing that a
grown man would lie like this I guess that's the standard of union thugs ???

I sold off nearly $3,000,000 in new motors and boats, depressing
the new boat
industry in southern Connecticut for an entire season. Everything
was sold...every cotter pin, every quart of oil, 30 days after I started.
For near full-retail, too.