P.Fritz wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 27 Jan 2005 13:52:35 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 27 Jan 2005 09:19:45 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

The right wing christians consider themselves holier than
thou
because,
unlike people who can think for themselves, they've been
brainwashed
into believing that if they lock step to 1) Christianity,
and
2)
BushCo, that they will be blessed with abundance and
happiness.
What
really makes me laugh is that these are the same people
who
think
that
Muslims are crazy and brainwashed for some of their
beliefs!



I suppose the left wing Christians are all just normal
Christians,
huh?

Some are, some aren't.

But not with conservative Christians.....they are all crazy
and
brainwashed....right?

Can you spin any faster, Jim? Just like your hero Rush, you
interject
something I've never, ever stated into the fray. Where did I
say
"all"?

A fanatic is a fanatic. Most that are of the
liberal mindset, however, aren't so narrow minded.


But not with conservative Christians.....they are all
narrow
minded.....right?

Again, Jim, where did I say "all"?


Ever hear of the word inference? When you say "The right wing
Christians "
you infer all right wing Christians. If you want to make a
distinction of
only *some*, then say so. Otherwise you infer *all*.

Got it?

Jeezus, that's a gem!!!! If one could infer *all*, then how come
the
exact same thing can't be said about *some*?
Come on, spin a few more times.

So if Jim says, "People from Georgia are really stupid," it's
okay
because there probably are *some* people from Georgia who really
*are*
stupid?

Where did I say it was "okay"? JimH is the one who thinks that it's
okay to "infer" something that hasn't ever been said!


Did I say you said it was "okay"? I don't recall that. I *do*
recall
asking you a question.

Asslicker has a problem with basic reading comprehension.


Well, hell, Fritz, lets give it a whirl, shall we? Please, show me
where I EVER said it was okay to "infer" something? Can you? Or are you
just blathering once again? Now, let's see YOU comprehend something. Go
back and read, JimH, one of your circle jerk buddies, is the one who
contends that one should "infer" something that was never, ever
said.....