On 27 Jan 2005 05:41:28 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


Tuuuk wrote:
ok,,, asskisser,,, lets have a look,,,

Your childish name calling negates any validity.

but please try and stay with the program,,,

krause was not in nam,, its obvious,,, he lied,, does that surprise
you???
again,, please try and stay with the program,,,

Again, I've asked what PROOF you have that he was not in VietNam? Be
specific.

also,, I believe I said there were no records of krause in nam,,, how
about
giving the head a shake for us,,, here is why,,,

What records have you researched? Again, be specific.

Who did the research?? did you?? I made the comment,, and I made it
from an
educated position,, here is why

At least 10 different people on this group have called krause a
liar,,
probably you to,,, If not more,, I personally call him a liar,, as I
have
caught him in well over a dozen lies,, Not to mention the
probabilities of
my accuracy in my statement you question,,, but in your country you
are
innocent until proven guilty,, so if you think your smart,, you prove
my
statement wrong,,, lol,,,, hint,,, that would make you my puppet and
krause
might not appreciate you doing that,,,

So, in your ignorance, you think you have "caught" him in lies? Again,
please be specific, and detailed. When you state what he has lied
about, tell me what evidence you have to the contrary.

So asskisser,,, please try and stick with the program,,, it is
clearly
obvious the man is a lier,,, what are you ,,,,blind???
See above.




Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes