JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:

Pssst....Bassy....this is the third time today you used the word
*validity*
in that same context.....the proper word to use would be
*credibility*, not
validity. Just a heads up.

Do you EVER get tired of being WRONG? Take special note of the 4th
meaning, the LOGICAL one, direct from dictionary.com:

val=B7id ( P ) Pronunciation Key (vld)
adj.
Well grounded; just: a valid objection.

Producing the desired results; efficacious: valid methods.

Having legal force; effective or binding: a valid title.

Logic.
Containing premises from which the conclusion may logically be
derived:
a valid argument.
Correctly inferred or deduced from a premise: a valid conclusion.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

An argument can have validity. A point of view can have validity.
A point
of objection can have validity. A person cannot have validity...a
person
can have credibility though.

You are batting .000.

Try again.

Please refer to the above from dictionary.com. Now, do you just happen
to see the part that says "well grounded"??? Now, do you ALSO happen to
see the part that says "effective"? In your eyes, you can't be
effective??????