JimH attempted to communicate thusly:

If you read it slowly this time you will see that I never said your
statement was directed towards me. I did say that you lie and
exaggerate to
prove your points.

And that is really too bad, eh Chuckie?

******************

"I never said your statement was directed toward me......." Horse
crap. You posted "Where did I ever say that?"..............and
proceeded to call me a "liar" for claiming that you had.

Only problem, 68F, is that I *never* claimed you had said it.

Again, and again, you demonstrate a lack of reading comprehension
skills. The funniest thing is that you argue, vehemently, all these
points when you don't understand your own position, let alone the other
side of the question. When you lose your tenuous grip on anything
resembling an understanding of the issue you run around screaming
"liar, liar."

You have said you reserve the right to call me a liar, and it's not
considered an insult because you believe its true.

To that end, I reserve the right to call you dumber than half a box of
rocks. Also not an insult, and for the same reason you have already
advanced.

Odd thing: any third party reading our exchange would observe that I
never posted the things you accuse me of posting, (the statements you
claim are lies). Any third party will have to draw his or her own
conclusion as to just how bright you appear as a result. Good luck,
68F, you put your foot in your mouth almost everytime you open it
lately.