"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Bert Robbins wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Bert Robbins wrote:


Deriliction of duty is not erased by saving a crew member.

The loss of the PT-109 sits squarely on Kennedy's shoulders and he is
responsible for its sinking.

This from a buttwiper whose most dangerous military duty was swabbing
out the head.


At least I served my country unlike you who spits on it anytime you
can.





I served my country, in a time of war, and in a war zone. I had two jobs
in Vietnam, the first having to do with an agricultural "pacification"
program, and the second having to do with the location, initial
identification and recovery of soldiers who bought it. Both duties were
at least 1000 per cent more hazardous than your time swabbing out heads.
Well, maybe not...you obviously were negatively impacted by your mop
time.


You didn't serve you did a job.


Really? Which definition of "serve" do you not understand?

s3;v) [a. OF. (and F.) serv-ir:—L. servWre to be a servant or slave, to
serve, f. serv-us slave, servant. Cf. Pr. servir, sirvir, Sp., Pg. servir,
It. servire.

You still didn't serve, you did a job. But, that is a strech because you
will not state your job title and they agency that employed you.