"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:07:40 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"WaIIy" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:39:28 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...


I know the cost of *recent history*.

How about the cost of letting a very small group of men wage ware,
while
Congress waffles about, afraid to object much because they're afraid
of
disagreeing with the president because they're from his political
party?
Examples: Phillippines, Vietnam, Iraq.


I guess you missed the TWO votes Congress made on Iraq.

Man, you are clueless.

Votes like that are for the benefit of the voting public, Wally boy.
Proof:
They impressed YOU.


That's your answer? Congress voted TWICE for authorization and you
dismiss them as "benefit of the voting public".

Anyway, of your premise is true, that's what they are elected for.

Holy smokes, you really can't admit when you're wrong. Cheesey.

When votes occur with a wink and a nod, they're for the cameras, Wally boy.