On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:23:38 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



I do think that "journalists" should be held to a high standard of
truth and accuracy in what they present as "facts". In those cases
where the article is a smattering of both facts, interspersed with
opinionated conclusions and speculation, it should be duly noted, to
alert people (like you it would seem) who may not be aware enough to
separate true premises from the speculative conclusions.

Dave

It's a shame you don't feel the same way about the lying POTUS and his
gang of thugs, few of whom seem able to tell the truth about anything.

There is no proof that the president lied about anything. You can cut
and paste every op-ed piece from every left wing rag you can find and
it still won't change that simple fact.

Dave