On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:02:14 -0500, Dave Hall wrote:


If you could point me to those "conditions", I would be most
appreciative. I truly don't remember any realistic conditions ever being
offered. I do remember Mullah Omar at one point, denying that the
Taliban even knew where Bin Laden was.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/waronterro...575593,00.html

Only through the news media's lack of daily coverage, do you perceive
the search for Bin Laden as "on the back burner". The search is
on-going. But it's tough to do, since most experts agree that his likely
hiding spot is in Pakastani territory where we don't have license to
search.

I believe it must be on the back burner. Bin Laden is still free. This
is the most powerful country on the planet. If, bin Laden was a top
priority, there is no way he would still be free 3 years after 9/11.

We don't have a license to search Pakistani territory? So, the following
words, given by Bush to Congress and the American people, were just so
much Bush Bull****? Doesn't the man ever mean what he says?

" And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism.
Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: Either you are
with us or you are with the terrorists."

" From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support
terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime."

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/2...sh.transcript/