On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:50:27 -0500, "P.Fritz"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:05:00 -0500, DSK wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:
You are convinced that Bush is guilty guilty guilty, but you have no
proof as to what he is guilty of.

Quote *one* post of mine where I said President Bush is guilty of
anything...

You just did below.


Other than lying (which is proven by his own public statements), such as
starting a war under false pretenses.

Where has he lied about that? What proof do you have that he
intentionally made a false statement?


Of course, he's unquestionably
guilty of dodging service in Viet Nam

At least he served in SOME capacity as compared to some other public
figures who completely dodged the draft.

He conviently ignores the dangers of any fighter pilot training.




, of DWI, and of various kinds of
fiscal malfeasance, all of which he's been found guilty of by our legal
system, and let slide because of his family connections & wealth.

DWI is a minor offense. The stuff stupid teenagers do. He had a wild
side in his youth. So sue him.

In reality, back several years ago.....DWI was NOT that big of an offense,
and what happend to Bush happened to countless people in countless small
towns.....until the neo prohibitionists under the guise of MADD changed the
landscape. Now it only happens onthe rare occassion that a county exec gets
cuaght.

Exactly. The picture is different when historical context and
perspective is taken into consideration.


You've often claimed to be a conservative, yet you are constantly
defending liberals

Not at all. I am pointing out the stupidity of many people who claim to
be "conservative" but are nothing other than hate-spewing morons.

A differing opinion is automatically considered "hate" to you? That's
the sort of demonization games that liberals play when they try to
silence the opposition.

Besides, President Clinton was a centrist, a moderate. That is one of
the keys to his success.

He was more or less forced to be that way once the republicans took
over the congress in '95. Since Clinton was more concerned with his
legacy, he learned how to dance.

Don't you love the liebrals revisionist history...........centrist /
moderate.....only AFTER he attempted the large guvmint take over of any
private sector business.....and got slammed doing it, only AFTER his party
lost majority rule for the first time in 40 something years.

That minor detail is conveniently overlooked when liberals heap their
praise on Clinton.


Dave