Jack Goff wrote:
Get over it, 'licker !! You're responding to a post that's nearly
two weeks
old!
And I see that you have to resort to childish name calling. Can't make
a valid, semi-intelligent point without doing that, huh?
Just so we're clear... I had no idea (as you know) that your mother
was
dead when I posted the comeback above.
It doesn't matter whether my mother is dead or not. You've missed the
point. That being, that it is the lowest form of cowardice to have to
resort to flaming someone's mother to make a point. Truly low class.
The lowest.
But even knowing now... it makes
absolutely no difference. You posted an asinine, rhetorical question
that
was simply begging for a comeback. I supplied it. Not cowardly, not
courageously, but humorously! It's called HUMOR! Get it? No?
Oh, so you think that was humorous, huh? Well, the next time you ask a
question of the newsgroup, I'll make damned sure to say something truly
asinine, mean, and probably profane about YOUR mother. That should be a
real laugh riot, huh?
Oh well, guess what... with all the crap that flies around this NG
from both
sides of the issues, if you hang around here you WILL get some on
you. Bet
on it. And now that we know talking about someone's mother is not
off-limits when YOU do it, you may even get some more of the same,
when you
deserve it, or leave another opening. If you're too thin-skinned to
handle
this NG, you know the way out. Nobody is forcing you to participate.
That said, I promise to try to not talk about your mama anymore. Any
other
family members that you're fond of? grin
See? That kind of crap right there, makes one think that you are too
ignorant to enter into any type of debate intelligently. You have a
need to act like a child first, and call names and talk crap about
someone's family. Again, the lowest of the low class.
|