wrote in message
ups.com...
JimH wrote:
Really? I can think of 3,000 who died on 9-11 thanks to Clinton. I
can
also not recall anything he ever did to tray and stop
terrorism.......
**********************
Nobody should have to spend the rest of their life so grossly
underinformed:
Gee Chuck, and just how did those actions stop 9-11?
******************************
If you had the ability to see your own weasly flip-flop here, you'd
(hopefully) be ashamed.
Note: Your first bitch was that you could not "recall anything
(Clinton) ever did to
(try) and stop terrorism...."
After being presented with a long list of actions, including several
that were specifically stonewalled by a Republican congress, and after
being presented with the fact that the Gore Commission specifically
discovered and warned about a credible threat that terrorists were
planning to use hijacked commercial aircraft as weapons against US
facilities....YOU CHANGE THE QUESTION!
You reject the answer to your previous question and then attempt to
pretend that your initial question was whether Clinton had effectively
"stopped" 9-11.
I would say that since 9-11 happened after Clinton no longer had the
power to "stop it" and his successor had been in place for about eight
months- Clinton did a good job of preventing 9-11 on his watch.
You guys have the funniest standards. You are eager to blame the first
terrorist attack that took place *six weeks* after Clinton took office
squarely on Bill Clinton, and you never hear any of the right wing
reactionaries even suggest that Bush the First could have been to blame
in any manner. The attack that took place eight months after your boy
slid into office, (and immediately appointed his campaign manager as
head of anti terrorist operations), that attack?
That has to be the fault of the preceding administration, obviously.
Neo-Conservatism will subside because it is intellectually dishonest.
The kool-aid drinking disciples who fail to recognize that may be
intellectually honest enough in their own right- merely intellectually
challenged.
|