JimH wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 19:00:37 -0500, JimH wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 12:50:19 -0500, Dixon wrote:



I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join
ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our
sons and daughters who are now fighting.

Don't expect any improvement from this administration. Party unity is
more important to them than veterans.


http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index....9805517220.xml


Wow, the *reporter* interjects a biased opinion in the very first
sentence of the story. I thought reporters were to report stories, not
editorialize, but what would one expect from a liberal newspaper?

Do you have more credible links on this Thunder?

Oh please, the Star-Ledger is a quality newspaper.

Your *opinion* but not that of the majority.

Now direct me to another source that provides specific proof that "the
move was prompted by the New Jersey lawmaker's failure to follow the party
line and his insistence on increasing spending for veterans".

None of the links you provided could do so.

Coincidence? ;-)

Here's a place you can look it up yourself while your waiting for your
"Instant Messenger Buddies" to "maybe" sign on again so you can pester them.
If I were you I wouldn't hold my breath. They probibly got you blocked.

Nobody has to prove anything to you.

http://www.google.com/

Good luck with your search.
--
_______m___õ¿~___m_________________________