View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
JohnH
 
Posts: n/a
Default Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see...

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:12:51 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

NOYB wrote:

Every other news agency refers to the troops as "US soldiers, US forces, or
coalition forces". Aljazeera constantly refers to them as "occupation
forces".

As for the protestors in Tikrit and Ramadi...
I'd say it's a pretty safe bet that those are the very same bad guys who
keeping taking pot shots at our troops. Perhaps we can have one of those
"accidental" bombings drop right in the middle of 'em.



The correct term is occupation forces. That's what they are.
Perhaps you ought to google the term and learn that after WW I and WW II
the allied forces called themselves "Occupied Forces," and "Occupying
Forces." There even were medals issued to individual soldiers to mark
such service.


No quibbling, no nothing, just a lie. As I said, you have shown yourself to be
devoid of integrity.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD