"DSK" wrote in message
...
NOBBY wrote:
I'm the one citing the actual article, and you have the nerve to say that
I'm the one lying? Ha!


Ha indeed. Your citing the Lancet article has *nothing* to do with the
info I was posting earlier.

In any event, your cites of the Lancet article prove nothing
conclusively... nor does it claim to... about the civilian casualties do
to US force. However there are other studies of this.

Are you claiming that the US has killed no innocent civilians? Are you
claiming that the Lancet says we've killed 198,000? Are you claiming that
because this study is based on crude statistics, that no study cna be
relied on and therefor we should ignore the issue?

You're just obfuscating... same thing as lying when you are deliberately
trying to deny the truth.

DSK


We've killed far fewer than one hundred thousand *innocent* civilians. In
fact, we've likely killed fewer than a couple of thousand *innocent*
civilians. In any case, over the last 6 months, we've killed a lot less
civilians than the terrorists have. And we aren't specifically targeting
civilians like the terrorists are doing.