John Gaquin wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

The fact remains that Bush invaded Iraq for strictly personal political
reasons.

That's not a 'fact', it's your mantra. In standard Dem/union tactic of the
past several years, you repeat the lie ad nauseam in the hope that after a
certain number of hearings, people will accept it as fact. And it works, up
to a point, because a fair percentage of the population is poorly educated
and/or just plain stupid (the Dem base). A mob of fools believing a lie
doesn't make it any less a lie, but as the saying goes, when the fools in
town are on your side, anything is possible.



Oh? Which reason on the ever-growing list of the Bush Adminsitration
lies and mis-statements did you buy into? The WMD? The Nukes? The close
tie-in of Osama to Saddam? All of which have been debunked. Oh... I
know...Saddam was preparing to attack Topeka. No? Making Iraq safe for
western-style democracy? No?

Wait, wait, I have it! Saddam was a bad boy.

North Korea is a far greater threat to us than Iraq ever was. I don't
seen you dumb-boy POTUS wagging his finger at the North Koreans.

--
Email sent to is never read.