View Single Post
  #48   Report Post  
Keenan Wellar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

in article , rick etter at
wrote on 11/30/04 5:27 PM:


"Keenan Wellar" wrote in message
. ..

"riverman" wrote in message
...

"Keenan Wellar" wrote in message
. ..
I think you guys are getting hung up on semantic technicalities.

Actually, it's the other way around. I think ou are playing semantics
around the idea of when the US was at war. They were at war the first
time they took a shot, which is particularly obvious in a discussion
about US willingness for involvement in WWII as compared to other
countries.


Well, you can look at it that way, but I look forward to hearing you
explain how the term 'legally' had nothing to do with laws.
:-)


Heh. I'm talking about what meaning people associate with "being at war."
I think for most people the standard is:

1) You declare "we are at war with country x"
2) You gather up a bunch of weapons and hurl them at country x

====================
Such is the limited thinking that passes for leftie idealism, eh fool?


What is leftist and/or idealist about that statement? If anything, it's
probably more right-wing in appearance, and I don't think it represents any
sort of idealism whatsoever.