"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 13:19:38 -0500, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Capt._Neal=AE?= wrote:

You are the person spinning. Show me where I ever stated Gore was the
first to file in court, please.

What I wrote is this:

"Isn't it quite sad how Democrats seem to accept the tactic of attempting
to use the courts to win their elections?

"Gore started this tactic without realizing it is a lose-lose
proposition."

I said nothing about anyone's being first to file in court.

What I did say is how sad it is that Democrats seem to accept the fact of
attempting to use the courts to win their elections.

Bush was the winner. Gore tried to use the courts to have himself
declared
the winner. This is consistent with my statement.

You, in typical lying liberal fashion are attempting to change the
subject
because you lost on the original topic.


Uh, huh. "Gore started this tactic." But, hey, that's just a
technicality. Bush went to court first, and in liberal fashion, in
*federal* court, not in state court where the Constitution mandates
election law lies. Bush is no conservative, and neither are you.

Oh, the two cases you cite, Bush v. Palm Beach Canvassing Board et. al.
and Bush v. Gore, both have Bush's name in the first position, the
plaintiff's position. Since you are "someone who knows the law", do I
need remind you that a plaintiff is the one who seeks redress in the
Courts.

You seem to have difficulty with simple concepts. Perhaps, a doctor's
visit is in order.

Neal is slightly obtuse, you might suggest the type of "doctor" he should
visit. He might even be able to see one for free.
John Cairns